Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California v. California, 1:19-cv-00024-AWI-SKO. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191218c19 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING NON-PARTY MOTION (Doc. 45) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On December 9, 2019, James Acres, a non-party to this case, filed a motion titled "Motion to Unseal Order at Docket 32 and Unredact RONs 2722 and 2992." (Doc. 45.) Mr. Acres is not a party to this case and has not sought leave to intervene pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b). Thus, because Mr. Acres' motion is not properly before the Court, the motion will be
More

ORDER DENYING NON-PARTY MOTION

(Doc. 45)

On December 9, 2019, James Acres, a non-party to this case, filed a motion titled "Motion to Unseal Order at Docket 32 and Unredact RONs 2722 and 2992." (Doc. 45.) Mr. Acres is not a party to this case and has not sought leave to intervene pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b). Thus, because Mr. Acres' motion is not properly before the Court, the motion will be denied. Cf. San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court— N. Dist. (San Jose), 187 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 1999).

Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The non-party motion filed on December 9, 2019, (Doc. 45), is DENIED.

2. The duplicative motion entered on the docket on December 12, 2019, (Doc. 50), is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer