Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: NOTICE AND REQUEST [AND PROPOSED ORDER] ATTACHMENT TO DEFENDANT'S DISPOSITIONAL MEMORANDUM UNDER SEAL WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Harry Hawkins, by and through his undersigned counsel, requests that "Exhibit A: San Joaquin County Behavioral health Services, mental health Services, Mental Health Evaluation and Diagnosis of Harry Hawkins," an attachment to defendant's Sentencing Memorandum, be filed under seal. Sealing is sought because the docu
Summary: NOTICE AND REQUEST [AND PROPOSED ORDER] ATTACHMENT TO DEFENDANT'S DISPOSITIONAL MEMORANDUM UNDER SEAL WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Harry Hawkins, by and through his undersigned counsel, requests that "Exhibit A: San Joaquin County Behavioral health Services, mental health Services, Mental Health Evaluation and Diagnosis of Harry Hawkins," an attachment to defendant's Sentencing Memorandum, be filed under seal. Sealing is sought because the docum..
More
NOTICE AND REQUEST [AND PROPOSED ORDER] ATTACHMENT TO DEFENDANT'S DISPOSITIONAL MEMORANDUM UNDER SEAL
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Harry Hawkins, by and through his undersigned counsel, requests that "Exhibit A: San Joaquin County Behavioral health Services, mental health Services, Mental Health Evaluation and Diagnosis of Harry Hawkins," an attachment to defendant's Sentencing Memorandum, be filed under seal. Sealing is sought because the document contains sensitive health and mental information about Mr. Hawkins, including recent mental health diagnosis, psycho-social history, and other private information.
ORDER
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the defendant's Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's "Exhibit A" attachment to DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM, file on or about December 16, 2019, pertaining to defendant Harry Hawkins, shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the counsel for the defendant and the government.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the defendant's request, sealing the defendant's documents serves a compelling interest.
