Cardenas v. Bethesda Lutheran Communities, Inc., 1:18-cv-01429-LJO-SKO. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191223903
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 30) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On December 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 1 (Doc. 30.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. 30) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On December 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 1 (Doc. 30.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. I..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. 30)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
On December 18, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice.1 (Doc. 30.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The parties also requested that the Court "shall have continuing jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the provisions of the settlement and release agreement executed by the Parties." (See Doc. 30 at 2.) The Court in its discretion declines the parties' request. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994); Camacho v. City of San Luis, 359 F. App'x 794, 798 (9th Cir. 2009); California Sportfishing Prot. All. v. Agric. Mgmt. & Prod. Co., Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02328-KJM-AC, 2016 WL 4796841, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2016) (noting that "the court in its discretion typically declines to maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement agreement.").
Source: Leagle
