Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Amador, 1:18-cr-00207-LJO-SKO. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200107962 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER RE MOTION TO SUPPRESS/SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS (ECF NOS. 226 & 232) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The Court has received and reviewed the Defendant's Motion to Suppress/Request for a Franks Hearing, Defendant's Supplemental Motion, the Government's Oppositions, and the Defense Replies. The bases of the motion include the alleged invalidity of the wiretaps and the alleged untimeliness of the execution of the Search Warrants. The briefing on both sides is clear
More

ORDER RE MOTION TO SUPPRESS/SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS

(ECF NOS. 226 & 232)

The Court has received and reviewed the Defendant's Motion to Suppress/Request for a Franks Hearing, Defendant's Supplemental Motion, the Government's Oppositions, and the Defense Replies.

The bases of the motion include the alleged invalidity of the wiretaps and the alleged untimeliness of the execution of the Search Warrants.

The briefing on both sides is clear as to fact, law, position, and argument. As a result:

1. The hearing currently set for January 10, 2020 is not needed and is vacated;

2. The Motion to Suppress and Supplemental Motion to Suppress, Including the Request for a Franks hearing, are Denied on the following grounds:

a. The Court incorporates by reference Document 247 at pages 1: 18-23 1:25-2:15 3:7-8 3:24-10:2 13:7-14:11 16:7-18:19 21:6-22:8 22:15-23:14 23:24-28 24:20-28:24 b. The Court incorporates by reference Document 248 2:10-3:17 4:21-6:6 6:10-8:11 9:4-16 10:6-8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer