Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:19-cv-01103-JLT. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200110721
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 11) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 7, 2020, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to serve her confidential letter brief. (Doc. 11 at 1) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 3), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The extension of time is
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 11) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 7, 2020, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to serve her confidential letter brief. (Doc. 11 at 1) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 3), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The extension of time is ..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 11)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 7, 2020, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of thirty days to serve her confidential letter brief. (Doc. 11 at 1) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 3), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The extension of time is GRANTED; and
2. Plaintiff SHALL serve the confidential letter brief no later than February 12, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
