Shoemaker v. Saul, 2:19-cv-01230-CKD. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200110764
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate by counsel that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence four. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrativ
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate by counsel that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence four. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate by counsel that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four.
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge to reconsider the claimant's subjective complaints; reconsider the claimant's residual functional capacity and Dr. West's opinion; if necessary, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert; offer the claimant a hearing; and issue a new decision. The parties stipulate that the Commissioner shall reassign this case on remand to a different administrative law judge.
Respectfully submitted January 7, 2020.
DATED: January 7, 2020 STUART BARASCH
(as authorized by email)
Attorney for Plaintiff
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DATED: January 7, 2020 By DANIEL P. TALBERT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
