ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action for wrongful termination. Pending before the court are: (1) plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 42); (2) plaintiff's motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 43); and (3) plaintiff's motion for a one-day extension of time (ECF No. 45).

Plaintiff's motion to strike and motion for leave to amend will be stricken because they were not properly noticed. Except in cases where one party is incarcerated and proceeding pro se, all motions must be noticed for hearing on the assigned Magistrate Judge's or District Judge's calendar. See Local Rule 230(b), (1). Here, neither motion was noticed for hearing.

Plaintiff's motion for a one-day extension of time will be denied as late. On December 4, 2019, the court granted plaintiff's prior motion for an extension of time to December 6, 2019, to file an opposition to defendant's pending motion for summary judgment. No opposition was filed by that date. On December 27, 2019 — three weeks after expiration of the previously extended deadline — plaintiff filed the instant motion for an additional extension of time. Because the motion was filed after the deadline sought to be extended, it is untimely and will be denied as such.1

Defendant's motion for summary judgment, which is unopposed at this time, will be addressed by separate findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to strike (ECF No. 42) and plaintiff's motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 43) are stricken; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for a one-day extension of time (ECF No. 45) is denied as untimely.