Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Nordbye v. Mountain Lion Acquisitions Inc., 1:19-cv-00940-DAD-SAB. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200116959 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER DISREGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (ECF No. 37) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Scott Nordbye filed this action against Defendants Mountain Lion Acquisitions Inc. and Trans Union LLC on July 10, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On August 27, 2019, Defendant Mountain Lion Acquisitions filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) On September 11, 2019, Defendant Trans Union filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 16.) On January 13, 2020, a stipulation of dismissal of Defend
More

ORDER DISREGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

(ECF No. 37)

Plaintiff Scott Nordbye filed this action against Defendants Mountain Lion Acquisitions Inc. and Trans Union LLC on July 10, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On August 27, 2019, Defendant Mountain Lion Acquisitions filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) On September 11, 2019, Defendant Trans Union filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 16.) On January 13, 2020, a stipulation of dismissal of Defendant Mountain Lion Acquisitions was filed. (ECF No. 37.) The stipulation of dismissal is only signed by Plaintiff and Defendant Mountain Lion Acquisitions.

Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, `a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.'" Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). Here, Defendants Mountain Lion Acquisitions and Trans Union have filed an answer, so Plaintiff cannot voluntarily dismiss a defendant pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides that a "plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Rule 41(a) allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson, 111 F.3d at 692. However, although Trans Union has appeared, the stipulation is only signed by Plaintiff and Defendant Mountain Lion Acquisitions.

A party may also dismiss an action by filing a motion requesting the Court to dismiss the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) is addressed to the sound discretion of the district court. Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir. 1982).

Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal is defective under Rule 41(a) because it is not a signed stipulation by all parties who have appeared and it is not a motion under Rule 41(a)(2). If Plaintiff wishes to dismiss this action, he is required to comply with the procedures set forth in Rule 41 by filing a stipulation that complies with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) signed by all parties who have appeared or a motion under Rule 41(a)(2).

Accordingly, Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal is HEREBY DISREGARDED. Plaintiff shall file a request for dismissal that complies with Rule 41 within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer