James v. Saul, 1:18-cv-01265-JDP. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200116981
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that the Commissioner of Social Security has agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Stipulation for Voluntary Remand Upon remand to the defendant, the Appeals Council will remand this case to an
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that the Commissioner of Social Security has agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Stipulation for Voluntary Remand Upon remand to the defendant, the Appeals Council will remand this case to an ..
More
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that the Commissioner of Social Security has agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Stipulation for Voluntary Remand
Upon remand to the defendant, the Appeals Council will remand this case to an Administrative Law Judge with instructions to reevaluate the medical evidence. In particular, the ALJ shall reconsider Plaintiff's mental health impairments and document the application of the special technique for evaluating mental impairments. The ALJ shall then proceed with the remaining steps of the sequential evaluation process, reassess Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and as necessary, obtain additional vocational expert testimony.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: December 19, 2019 By: /s/Matthew C. James*
MATTHEW C. JAMES
*Authorized by email on December 19, 2019
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: December 19, 2019 McGregor W. Scott
United States Attorney
By: /s/Michael K. Marriott
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
Of Counsel
Jeffrey Chen
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
ORDER
As stipulated, this case is remanded to the Administrative Law Judge so that the medical evidence may be re-evaluated. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
