Banton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 1:19-CV-00928-DAD-JLT. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200116a76
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2020
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 26) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the Court orders that the time for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond to Plaintiff Daryl Banton's First Amended Complaint be continued to, up to and including, February 17, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 26)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the Court orders that the time for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond to Plaintiff Daryl Banton's First Amended Complaint be continued to, up to and including, February 17, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
