Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gurrola v. Community Action Partnership of Madera County, 1:17-cv-01569-LJO-BAM. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200117c30 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF OVER-LENGTH BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . Plaintiffs Lucina Gurrola, Marquelia Aponte, Mercedes Jimenez, Maria C. Ascencio and Maura Gomez (" Plaintiffs ") and Defendant Community Action Partnership of Madera County (" CAPMC "), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows: 1. Defendant may file a brief in opposition to
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FILING OF OVER-LENGTH BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Plaintiffs Lucina Gurrola, Marquelia Aponte, Mercedes Jimenez, Maria C. Ascencio and Maura Gomez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Community Action Partnership of Madera County ("CAPMC"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:

1. Defendant may file a brief in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Adjudication up to and including 40 pages in length; and

2. Plaintiffs may file a reply brief in support of their Motion for Summary Adjudication up to and including 20 pages in length.

Dated: January 15, 2020 MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES, WISHON, BREWER & RYAN, LLP By: /s/Russell K. Ryan Russell K. Ryan, Attorneys for Defendant Community Action Partnership of Madera County Dated: January 15, 2020 LANG, RICHERT & PATCH By: /s/Charles Trudrung Taylor Charles Trudrung Taylor, Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the above stipulation is approved.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer