Lucas v. Saul, 2:18-cv-02184 JAM CKD. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200124b36
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") finding that she had excess resources for the period from January 2011 through June 2015 under Section 416.1201(a) of the Social Security Act. On December 10, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") finding that she had excess resources for the period from January 2011 through June 2015 under Section 416.1201(a) of the Social Security Act. On December 10, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within f..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") finding that she had excess resources for the period from January 2011 through June 2015 under Section 416.1201(a) of the Social Security Act.
On December 10, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDRED that:
1. The December 10, 2019 findings and recommendations are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 25) is denied;
3. Plaintiff's motion to remand (ECF No. 27) is denied;
4. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 28) is granted; and
4. Judgment is entered for the Commissioner.
Source: Leagle
