Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gomez v. City of Vacaville, 2:18-CV-02698-KJM-KJN. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200131841 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2020
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff CARLOS M. GOMEZ, SR. and defendants OFFICER WILLIAM BOEHM and CITY OF VACAVILLE, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the parties to the above-captioned matter that the parties respectfully request the Court issue an order continuing expert discover
More

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES ORDER

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Plaintiff CARLOS M. GOMEZ, SR. and defendants OFFICER WILLIAM BOEHM and CITY OF VACAVILLE, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN the parties to the above-captioned matter that the parties respectfully request the Court issue an order continuing expert discovery deadlines as follows: Expert disclosure deadline continued from February 14, 2020 to May 15, 2020; Rebuttal expert disclosure deadline continued from February 28, 2020 to May 29, 2020; and Expert discovery cut off continued from March 13, 2020 to June 12, 2020.

Good cause exists for the requested continuance. On January 27, 2020, the Court continued the hearing date on defendants' motion for summary judgment from February 7, 2020 to March 6, 2020. (Docket No. 30) The requested alteration of the expert discovery deadlines is therefore necessary to permit the parties to sufficiently complete expert discovery without incurring potentially unnecessary expert costs in the event summary judgment is granted.

This is the first request to continue the expert discovery deadlines. This extension will not affect any other dates previously set by the Court.

For the reasons set forth above, the parties respectfully request this Court continue the previously set expert discovery deadlines as follows:

Event Current Date New Date Expert Disclosures February 14, 2020 May 15, 2020 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures February 28, 2020 May 29, 2020 Close of Expert Discovery March 13, 2020 June 12, 2020

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND REQUESTED THROUGH THE PARTIES COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: January 28, 2020 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL By: /s/ Richard W. Osman Richard W. Osman Sheila D. Crawford Attorneys for Defendants OFFICER WILLIAM BOEHM and CITY OF VACAVILLE Dated: January 28, 2020 BEEKMAN CORTES LLP By: /s/Catherine A. Beekman Catherine A. Beekman Attorneys for Plaintiff CARLOS M. GOMEZ SR.

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION

I, Richard W. Osman, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature ("/s/") within this E-filed document or have been authorized by counsel to show their signature on this document as/s/.

Dated: January 28, 2020 BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL By: /s/Richard W. Osman

ORDER

WHEREFORE, good cause appearing and pursuant to stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that the expert discovery deadlines are continued as follows:

Expert disclosure deadline continued from February 14, 2020, to May 15, 2020;

Rebuttal expert disclosure deadline continued from February 28, 2020, to May 29, 2020; and Expert discovery cut off continued from March 13, 2020, to June 12, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer