Zoom Imaging Solutions, Inc. v. Roe, 2:19-cv-1544-WBS-KJN. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200203940
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: ORDER LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY (ECF No. 57) KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On November 13, the undersigned stayed discovery in this case (with minor exceptions), as the operative pleadings were in flux. 1 On January 30, 2020, District Judge Shubb ruled on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, granting it in part as to two claims, but otherwise denying the motion. ( See ECF No. 84.) Thus, Plaintiff now proceeds on nine claims against Defendants—sounding in breach of contract, interfere
Summary: ORDER LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY (ECF No. 57) KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On November 13, the undersigned stayed discovery in this case (with minor exceptions), as the operative pleadings were in flux. 1 On January 30, 2020, District Judge Shubb ruled on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, granting it in part as to two claims, but otherwise denying the motion. ( See ECF No. 84.) Thus, Plaintiff now proceeds on nine claims against Defendants—sounding in breach of contract, interferen..
More
ORDER LIFTING STAY OF DISCOVERY
(ECF No. 57)
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On November 13, the undersigned stayed discovery in this case (with minor exceptions), as the operative pleadings were in flux.1 On January 30, 2020, District Judge Shubb ruled on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, granting it in part as to two claims, but otherwise denying the motion. (See ECF No. 84.) Thus, Plaintiff now proceeds on nine claims against Defendants—sounding in breach of contract, interference with contractual relations, trade secret, computer fraud, and breach of fiduciary duties. (See Id.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of discovery (ECF No. 57) is LIFTED. Further, since Defendants have withdrawn their related Motion to Quash (ECF No. 76, 85), the February 6, 2020 hearing on that motion is VACATED.
FootNotes
1. See ECF No. 53, "Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to dismiss"; ECF No. 57, "Order Granting in Part Motion to Stay Discovery"; ECF No. 61, the "First Amended Complaint"; ECF No. 68, "Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss"
Source: Leagle
