Caputo v. Gonzalez, 1:15-cv-01008-EPG (PC). (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200206737
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL (ECF NO. 227) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On February 4, 2020, the parties filed a motion for an extension of time, asking that they be given until March 4, 2020, to file the stipulation for dismissal. (ECF No. 227). The parties ask for this extension "due to difficulties in obtaining the signature to the agreed upon settlement from Plaintiff, who is in federal custody out of state." ( Id. at
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL (ECF NO. 227) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On February 4, 2020, the parties filed a motion for an extension of time, asking that they be given until March 4, 2020, to file the stipulation for dismissal. (ECF No. 227). The parties ask for this extension "due to difficulties in obtaining the signature to the agreed upon settlement from Plaintiff, who is in federal custody out of state." ( Id. at ..
More
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
(ECF NO. 227)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On February 4, 2020, the parties filed a motion for an extension of time, asking that they be given until March 4, 2020, to file the stipulation for dismissal. (ECF No. 227). The parties ask for this extension "due to difficulties in obtaining the signature to the agreed upon settlement from Plaintiff, who is in federal custody out of state." (Id. at 1).
The Court finds good cause to grant the parties' motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that parties have until March 4, 2020, to file the stipulation for dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
