Mendez-Barocio v. Valinken, 1:19-cv-01319-SKO (HC). (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200207985
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ALLOW LATE FILING EXHIBIT (Doc. 24) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. On February 3, 2020, the Court issued an order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 22.) On the same date, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to allow the late filing of an exhibit. (Doc. 24.) Since the
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ALLOW LATE FILING EXHIBIT (Doc. 24) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. On February 3, 2020, the Court issued an order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 22.) On the same date, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to allow the late filing of an exhibit. (Doc. 24.) Since the ..
More
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ALLOW LATE FILING EXHIBIT
(Doc. 24)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
On February 3, 2020, the Court issued an order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 22.) On the same date, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to allow the late filing of an exhibit. (Doc. 24.) Since the petition has been denied, Petitioner's motion is now moot. The Court further notes that the exhibit has no relevance to the Court's decision to deny the petition.
Accordingly, Petitioner's motion is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
