Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clemens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 2:18:CV-00084 JAM AC. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200207a43 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through their respective counsel and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal with Prejudice of this action, including all claims stated herein against Defendant, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. SO STIPULATED. Dat
More

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON

The parties to this action, acting through their respective counsel and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal with Prejudice of this action, including all claims stated herein against Defendant, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 3, 2020 HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON, LLP By: ________________________________________ ANTHONY S. PETRU, State Bar No. 91399 CAROLE BOSCH, State Bar No. 239790 Attorneys for Plaintiff TIM C. CLEMENS DATED: February 5, 2020 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY By: ________________________________________ ROBERT J. GIBBONS, State Bar No. 314653 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

ORDER

The Stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims stated herein against Defendant, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer