Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Englert v. City of Merced, 1:18-cv-01239-NONE-SAB. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200210958 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND VACATING FEBRUARY 12, 2020 HEARING (ECF No. 31) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On January 15, 2020, Plaintiffs Chad Englert, Ryan Paskin, Richard Ramirez, Matthew Van Hagen, and Casey Wilson filed a notice of motion and motion to compel. (ECF No. 31.) On January 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice rescheduling hearing on the motion to February 12, 2020. (ECF No. 32.) Pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of Californi
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND VACATING FEBRUARY 12, 2020 HEARING

(ECF No. 31)

On January 15, 2020, Plaintiffs Chad Englert, Ryan Paskin, Richard Ramirez, Matthew Van Hagen, and Casey Wilson filed a notice of motion and motion to compel. (ECF No. 31.) On January 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice rescheduling hearing on the motion to February 12, 2020. (ECF No. 32.)

Pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California ("L.R."), if the moving party is still dissatisfied after meeting and conferring on the discovery disagreement, a joint statement is required to be filed. L.R. 251(b)(c). "The hearing [on a discovery disagreement] may be dropped from the calendar without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement or an affidavit . . . is not filed at least seven (7) days before the scheduled hearing date." L.R. 251(a).

Here, the joint statement was due on February 5, 2020 and has not been filed. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to compel is HEREBY DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and the FEBRUARY 12, 2020 hearing is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer