Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cavender v. Nevada County, 2:19-cv-01050 JAM-AC. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200219c46 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . The parties have met and conferred and have agreed to participate in an early Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman presiding. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their counsel of record, as follows: 1. That this matter be referred to Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman for a Settlement Confe
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DATE AND STAY OF DISCOVERY AND RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS

The parties have met and conferred and have agreed to participate in an early Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman presiding.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, through their counsel of record, as follows:

1. That this matter be referred to Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman for a Settlement Conference to be held on April 29, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 25;

2. Except for Rule 26(a) disclosures and the discovery described below, all formal discovery is stayed until 20 days after completion of the Settlement Conference;

3. The parties agree to cooperate in the informal exchange of information needed to prepare for the Settlement Conference, including exchanging the documents enumerated in Section 1 of the Proposed Protective Order;

4. Plaintiff agrees to cooperate with the Defendants noticing and taking up to three preliminary medical depositions,1 including the deposition of two medical providers and a medical expert designated by Plaintiff to prepare for the Settlement Conference;

5. Defendants agree to cooperate with Plaintiff noticing and taking of up to three preliminary percipient witness depositions; provided however, that if any of these witnesses are employees of the defendants, then the deposition will not be considered "preliminary", but as a regular deposition under the discovery rules;

6. The parties agree to meet and confer and submit a Joint Status Report 20 days following the Settlement Conference.

7. Responsive pleadings shall be due 20 days after completion of the Settlement Conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed and considered the Parties' Stipulation for an early Settlement Conference and finding good cause therefore, hereby approves:

1. That this matter be referred to Judge Kendall Newman for a Settlement Conference on April 29, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 25.

2. Discovery shall occur as set forth in the parties' Stipulation;

3. The parties shall complete Joint Status Reports and submit them to the Court within 20 days of the completion of the Settlement Conference;

4. Responsive pleadings shall be due 20 days after completion of the settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. "Preliminary" depositions will be taken under the FRCE in the normal manner. However, the parties agree that these depositions are preliminary and that depositions of these witnesses will not count towards the limit of 10 depositions under FRCP 30(a)(2)(A)(i) and the same deponents may be noticed a second time during the course of regular and/or expert discovery.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer