United States v. Miguel, 1:19-cr-00193-NONE-SKO. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200311984
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2020
Summary: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNSEL (DECLARATION OF CONFLICT) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Matthew Lemke, Assistant Federal Defender, and counsel of record in the above-captioned case, moves for an order allowing him to withdraw as counsel of record and for appointment of new counsel to represent defendant Dustin Miguel. In support of this motion, he avers as follows: 1. The Federal Defender's Office was appointed to represent Dustin Miguel o
Summary: MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNSEL (DECLARATION OF CONFLICT) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Matthew Lemke, Assistant Federal Defender, and counsel of record in the above-captioned case, moves for an order allowing him to withdraw as counsel of record and for appointment of new counsel to represent defendant Dustin Miguel. In support of this motion, he avers as follows: 1. The Federal Defender's Office was appointed to represent Dustin Miguel on..
More
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF NEW COUNSEL (DECLARATION OF CONFLICT)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Matthew Lemke, Assistant Federal Defender, and counsel of record in the above-captioned case, moves for an order allowing him to withdraw as counsel of record and for appointment of new counsel to represent defendant Dustin Miguel. In support of this motion, he avers as follows:
1. The Federal Defender's Office was appointed to represent Dustin Miguel on December 13, 2019 at his initial appearance in this district.
2. The undersigned is an employee of the Federal Defender's office and was assigned to represent Mr. Miguel on or about January 30, 2020.
3. At the time of acceptance of appointment, the Federal Defender's Office had completed its routine review for any potential conflicts and determined that no conflict existed.
4. Upon review of the discovery, it became apparent that the discovery and indictment in this matter are virtually identical to United States v. Brandon Godinho, 1:19-cr-00194-DAD-BAM, whom our office was appointed to represent on October 15, 2019. Because the cases were on separate indictments and came through several months apart, and significant portions of the discovery were redacted, our office was not able to catch the conflict until we thoroughly reviewed the discovery provided in both cases. Because the Office of the Federal Defender has had substantive conversations with both Mr. Miguel and Mr. Godinho, that has created a conflict with both clients, and thus the Office of the Federal Defender cannot continue to represent Mr. Miguel.
5. In light of the conflict, the Federal Defender's Office is unable to effectively represent Mr. Miguel, and therefore requests to withdraw as counsel and for new counsel to be appointed from the CJA Panel.
6. The CJA Panel Administrator was notified in advance and CJA counsel Michael McKneely is willing to accept appointment in this matter. We respectfully request that this Court appoint Michael McKneely for Mr. Miguel.
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: March 9, 2020 /s/ Matthew Lemke
MATTHEW LEMKE
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for DUSTIN MIGUEL
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED that the Office of the Federal Defender is relieved and that CJA Panel Attorney Michael McKneely is hereby appointed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
