Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nieto v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 2:20-cv-00422-JAM-EFB. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200312938 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2020
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR INITIAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Civ. L.R. 144(a)] EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER Presently before the Court is Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s ex parte application for an initial extension of time to respond to the Complaint pursuant to Local Rule 144(c). Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Chase's request. Chase shall answer, move to dismiss, o
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.'S EX PARTE REQUEST FOR INITIAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Civ. L.R. 144(a)]

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s ex parte application for an initial extension of time to respond to the Complaint pursuant to Local Rule 144(c). Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Chase's request. Chase shall answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before March 30, 2020.

The Clerk is directed to terminate ECF No. 6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer