Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mallory v. Odyssey Healthcare Operating A, L.P., 1:19-cv-01624-DAD-JLT. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20200313b10 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO STAY THE ACTION (Doc. 16) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . About two weeks after the Court scheduled the case (Doc. 14), the parties filed this stipulation to stay the action to allow them to engage in private mediation. (Doc. 16) In the stipulation, they do not explain when the mediation will occur. Id. They ask only that the stay be lifted 14 days after they complete mediation and any negotiations that may occur afterward. Id. Thus, the Court has
More

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO STAY THE ACTION

(Doc. 16)

About two weeks after the Court scheduled the case (Doc. 14), the parties filed this stipulation to stay the action to allow them to engage in private mediation. (Doc. 16) In the stipulation, they do not explain when the mediation will occur. Id. They ask only that the stay be lifted 14 days after they complete mediation and any negotiations that may occur afterward. Id. Thus, the Court has no information as to how long the stay will be in effect and, indeed, the obligation to report back to the Court is triggered only after the parties stop all efforts to negotiate a settlement. This inexactitude is insufficient. Thus, the stipulation is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer