Lear v. Akanno, 1:15-cv-01903-DAD-JDP. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200317826
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF ECF Nos. 100, 101 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . On March 11, 2020, plaintiff filed two motions to terminate his counsel. ECF Nos. 100, 101. Plaintiff's counsel was terminated on August 2, 2019, as counsel had been appointed solely for the purposes of settlement. Plaintiff further requests that the dispositive motions deadline be vacated because he does not wish to file any motion, go to trial, or participate in discovery
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF ECF Nos. 100, 101 JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . On March 11, 2020, plaintiff filed two motions to terminate his counsel. ECF Nos. 100, 101. Plaintiff's counsel was terminated on August 2, 2019, as counsel had been appointed solely for the purposes of settlement. Plaintiff further requests that the dispositive motions deadline be vacated because he does not wish to file any motion, go to trial, or participate in discovery a..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF
ECF Nos. 100, 101
JEREMY D. PETERSON, Magistrate Judge.
On March 11, 2020, plaintiff filed two motions to terminate his counsel. ECF Nos. 100, 101. Plaintiff's counsel was terminated on August 2, 2019, as counsel had been appointed solely for the purposes of settlement. Plaintiff further requests that the dispositive motions deadline be vacated because he does not wish to file any motion, go to trial, or participate in discovery and would like the case to go to settlement. ECF No. 101. Formal settlement has been attempted without success. ECF No. 93. Plaintiff—the party who filed this action—cannot litigate without complying with certain requirements. Thus, plaintiff's motions are denied as moot and for failure to provide good cause. ECF Nos. 100, 101.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
