Garrett Case v. Fisher, 1:19-cv-01739-DAD-BAM. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200319788
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY REDESIGNATE CASE AS A REGULAR CIVIL ACTION AND ASSIGN A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On December 13, 2029, Plaintiff Garrett Case ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The action was administratively designated as one involving a prisoner litigating the conditions of his confinement. As Plaintiff is not proceeding in pro se,
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY REDESIGNATE CASE AS A REGULAR CIVIL ACTION AND ASSIGN A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On December 13, 2029, Plaintiff Garrett Case ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The action was administratively designated as one involving a prisoner litigating the conditions of his confinement. As Plaintiff is not proceeding in pro se, ..
More
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY REDESIGNATE CASE AS A REGULAR CIVIL ACTION AND ASSIGN A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
On December 13, 2029, Plaintiff Garrett Case ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action was administratively designated as one involving a prisoner litigating the conditions of his confinement. As Plaintiff is not proceeding in pro se, this matter should be redesignated. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court SHALL change the administrative designation of the present case to reflect that of a regular civil rights action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
