Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rice Lake Contracting, Inc. v. United States, 19-2172 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: 19-2172 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 26, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 91 F.3d 167 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. RICE LAKE CONTRACTING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-5119. Unit
More

91 F.3d 167

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
RICE LAKE CONTRACTING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-5119.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 26, 1996.

ON MOTION

RICH, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

Upon consideration of the fact that new counsel has not entered an appearance on behalf of Rice Lake Contracting, Inc.,*

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

2

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

3

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

The court notes that the president for Rice Lake submits a letter dated April 2, 1996 stating that Rice Lake has "new counsel," but that an additional 30 days is required to "go over the appeal." In the court's March 6, 1996 order granting the motion of Sam Z. Gdanski to withdraw as counsel for Rice Lake, the court stated that this appeal would be dismissed if new counsel for Rice Lake did not enter an appearance within 30 days. Because new counsel has not entered an appearance, this appeal must now be dismissed

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer