Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

August Technology Corporation and Rudolph Technologies v. Camtek, 2010-1458 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: 2010-1458 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbejfeberaI ~ircuit AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. 2010-1458 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 05-CV-1396, Chief Judge Michael J. Davis. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. ORDER Camtek, Ltd. ("Camtek") moves for a partial stay of a pe
More
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbejfeberaI ~ircuit AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant. 2010-1458 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 05-CV-1396, Chief Judge Michael J. Davis. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. ORDER Camtek, Ltd. ("Camtek") moves for a partial stay of a permanent injunction issued by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. August Technology Corporation ("August") opposes.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer