Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MAX RACK, INC. v. HOIST FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC., 2010-1417. (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: infco20110210194 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 10, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2011
Summary: This disposition is nonprecedential JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

This disposition is nonprecedential

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer