Filed: Dec. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-1437 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Cross Appellant. _ 2012-1437, -1438 (Reexamination No. 95/000,413) _ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. _ ON MOTION _ ORDER Upon considerati
Summary: Case: 12-1437 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Cross Appellant. _ 2012-1437, -1438 (Reexamination No. 95/000,413) _ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. _ ON MOTION _ ORDER Upon consideratio..
More
Case: 12-1437 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Cross Appellant. __________________________ 2012-1437, -1438 (Reexamination No. 95/000,413) __________________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. __________________________ ON MOTION __________________________ ORDER Upon consideration of Panduit Corporation’s unop- posed motion to withdraw its Response and Reply Brief filed November 13, 2012, Case: 12-1437 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2012 PANDUIT CORPORATION v. KAPPOS 2 IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s25
