Filed: Mar. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ZIPHER LTD. AND VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. _ 2013-1032 _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire in No. 07-CV-0006, Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. _ Decided: March 25, 2013 _ KARA F. STOLL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Wit
Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ZIPHER LTD. AND VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. _ 2013-1032 _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire in No. 07-CV-0006, Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. _ Decided: March 25, 2013 _ KARA F. STOLL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP., of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With..
More
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZIPHER LTD. AND VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
______________________
2013-1032
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of New Hampshire in No. 07-CV-0006, Judge
Paul J. Barbadoro.
______________________
Decided: March 25, 2013
______________________
KARA F. STOLL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar-
rett & Dunner, LLP., of Washington, DC, argued for
defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was GARTH
D. BAER.
______________________
Before NEWMAN, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
2 MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION v. ZIPHER LTD.
PER CURIAM.
Subsequent to the district court’s final judgment the
parties agreed to a settlement that leaves no “legitimate,
continuing case or controversy.” Allflex USA, Inc. v. Avid
Identification Sys., Inc., 704 F.3d 1362, 1369 (Fed. Cir.
2013). Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.
DISMISSED
No costs.
