Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hood v. Opm, 19-2436 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: 19-2436 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-3126 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ RAINEY L. HOOD, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. _ 2013-3126 _ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA831E120227-I-1. _ ON MOTION _ PER CURIAM. ORDER Rainey L. Hood moves for leave to supplement the record. The Office of Personnel Management opposes. Our review of Merit Systems Protection Board (“B
More
Case: 13-3126   Document: 15     Page: 1   Filed: 11/25/2013




           NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


   United States Court of Appeals
       for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

                   RAINEY L. HOOD,
                      Petitioner,

                            v.

      OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
                   Respondent.
              ______________________

                       2013-3126
                 ______________________

    Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
 Board in No. DA831E120227-I-1.
                 ______________________

                     ON MOTION
                 ______________________

                       PER CURIAM.
                       ORDER
     Rainey L. Hood moves for leave to supplement the
 record. The Office of Personnel Management opposes.
     Our review of Merit Systems Protection Board
 (“Board”) decisions is based on the record before the
 Board. Mueller v. U.S. Postal Serv., 
76 F.3d 1198
, 1201-
 02 (Fed. Cir. 1996); see also Fed. R. App. P. 16(a). The
Case: 13-3126      Document: 15      Page: 2   Filed: 11/25/2013



 2                                                HOOD   v. OPM



 documents Hood seeks to add were not before the Board
 and therefore may not be considered on appeal.
       Upon consideration thereof,
       IT IS ORDERED THAT:
       The motion is denied.


                                       FOR THE COURT

                                        /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
                                            Daniel E. O’Toole
                                            Clerk of Court

 s26

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer