Hood v. Opm, 19-2436 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Number: 19-2436
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-3126 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ RAINEY L. HOOD, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. _ 2013-3126 _ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA831E120227-I-1. _ ON MOTION _ PER CURIAM. ORDER Rainey L. Hood moves for leave to supplement the record. The Office of Personnel Management opposes. Our review of Merit Systems Protection Board (“B
Summary: Case: 13-3126 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ RAINEY L. HOOD, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. _ 2013-3126 _ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA831E120227-I-1. _ ON MOTION _ PER CURIAM. ORDER Rainey L. Hood moves for leave to supplement the record. The Office of Personnel Management opposes. Our review of Merit Systems Protection Board (“Bo..
More
Case: 13-3126 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RAINEY L. HOOD,
Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
Respondent.
______________________
2013-3126
______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in No. DA831E120227-I-1.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Rainey L. Hood moves for leave to supplement the
record. The Office of Personnel Management opposes.
Our review of Merit Systems Protection Board
(“Board”) decisions is based on the record before the
Board. Mueller v. U.S. Postal Serv.,
76 F.3d 1198, 1201-
02 (Fed. Cir. 1996); see also Fed. R. App. P. 16(a). The
Case: 13-3126 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 11/25/2013
2 HOOD v. OPM
documents Hood seeks to add were not before the Board
and therefore may not be considered on appeal.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is denied.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
s26
Source: CourtListener