Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. SIDENSE CORPORATION, 2013-1009. (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: infco20130410137 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2013
Summary: This disposition is nonprecedential. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

This disposition is nonprecedential.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer