KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. SIDENSE CORPORATION, 2013-1009. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Number: infco20130410137
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2013
Summary: This disposition is nonprecedential. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Source: Leagle