Filed: Jun. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ June 12, 2014 ERRATA _ Appeal Nos. 2013-1245, -1246, -1247 ALLERGAN, INC., AND DUKE UNIVERSITY, v. APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC., AND HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.,. Decided: June 10, 2014 Precedential Opinion _ Please make the following changes: “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Locke Lord LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for Apo- tex Inc., et al.” to “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Rakocz
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ June 12, 2014 ERRATA _ Appeal Nos. 2013-1245, -1246, -1247 ALLERGAN, INC., AND DUKE UNIVERSITY, v. APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC., AND HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.,. Decided: June 10, 2014 Precedential Opinion _ Please make the following changes: “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Locke Lord LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for Apo- tex Inc., et al.” to “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Rakoczy..
More
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ June 12, 2014 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal Nos. 2013-1245, -1246, -1247 ALLERGAN, INC., AND DUKE UNIVERSITY, v. APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC., AND HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.,. Decided: June 10, 2014 Precedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Locke Lord LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for Apo- tex Inc., et al.” to “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illinois.”
