Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SHUKH v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, 2015-1012. (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: infco20151002231 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2015
Summary: This disposition is nonprecedential. PER CURIAM . In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court's judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court's costs judgment. VACATED AND REMANDED COSTS No costs.

This disposition is nonprecedential.

In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court's judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court's costs judgment.

VACATED AND REMANDED

COSTS

No costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer