Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Inspired Development Group v. Inspired Products Group, LLC, 18-2118 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Number: 18-2118 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ INSPIRED DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant MITCHELL PRINE, INDIVIDUALLY, Counterclaim Defendant v. INSPIRED PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DBA KIDSEMBRACE, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee _ 2018-2118 _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 9
More
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INSPIRED DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant MITCHELL PRINE, INDIVIDUALLY, Counterclaim Defendant v. INSPIRED PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DBA KIDSEMBRACE, LLC, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee ______________________ 2018-2118 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 9:16-cv-80076-RLR, Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. ______________________ Decided: September 18, 2019 ______________________ JOSEPH T. EAGLETON, Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, FL, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant. Also represented by STEVEN L. BRANNOCK. 2 INSPIRED DEVELOPMENT GROUP v. INSPIRED PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC THOMAS A. DYE, Cozen O'Connor, West Palm Beach, FL, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee. Also represented by JAMES A. GALE, ARTHUR ROBERT WEAVER, Miami, FL. ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL, Circuit Judges. PROST, Chief Judge. Based on our holding in Inspired Development Group, LLC v. Inspired Products Group, LLC, 2018-1616 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 18, 2019), that the district court lacked subject mat- ter jurisdiction over the case underlying that appeal and this appeal, we vacate the district court’s judgment award- ing attorneys’ fees. VACATED COSTS The parties shall bear their own costs.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer