Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANTA CLARA VALLEY HOUSING GROUP, INC. v. U.S., 5:08-cv-05097 HRL. (2010)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20101116a89 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 16, 2010
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2010
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR THIRD PARTY DOUGLAS DUNCAN'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, plaintiffs Santa Clara Valley Housing Group, Inc. and Kristen M. Bowes ("plaintiffs"), defendant the United States of America ("defendant"), and third party deponent Douglas Duncan ("Mr. Duncan"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows and respectfully request that the Court enter the followin
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR THIRD PARTY DOUGLAS DUNCAN'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL

HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, plaintiffs Santa Clara Valley Housing Group, Inc. and Kristen M. Bowes ("plaintiffs"), defendant the United States of America ("defendant"), and third party deponent Douglas Duncan ("Mr. Duncan"), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows and respectfully request that the Court enter the following Proposed Order:

WHEREAS plaintiffs have filed a Motion to Compel Third Party Douglas Duncan to Testify despite his assertion of the Fifth Amendment, which motion is presently scheduled for December 7, 2010;

WHEREAS, based upon the hearing date, Mr. Douglas' opposition to the Motion to Compel would be due on November 16, 2010;

WHEREAS on November 12, 2010, defendant filed a Non-Opposition and Response to Motion to Compel Testimony of Douglas Duncan;

WHEREAS, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Declaration of Stan Roman, counsel for Mr. Duncan believes that Mr. Duncan is entitled to additional time to file its opposition to address issues raised in defendant's Non-Opposition and Response;

WHEREAS plaintiffs, defendant and Mr. Duncan agree that Mr. Duncan should be permitted additional time, up to and including November 19, 2010, to file his opposition;

WHEREAS the requested extension of time will not alter the date for plaintiffs' reply or the hearing date for this matter.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to approval of the Court, third party Douglas Duncan shall be permitted additional time, up to and including November 19, 2010, to file his opposition to plaintiff's Motion to Compel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer