Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION v. BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC, CV-10-3489-LHK. (2010)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20101118e01 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 18, 2010
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2010
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. WHEREAS on July 27, 2010, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco; WHEREAS on August 9, 2010, Defendants removed the case to this Court; WHEREAS on September 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand this case to state court, which is scheduled to be heard on December 9, 2010; WHEREAS pursua
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

WHEREAS on July 27, 2010, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco;

WHEREAS on August 9, 2010, Defendants removed the case to this Court;

WHEREAS on September 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand this case to state court, which is scheduled to be heard on December 9, 2010;

WHEREAS pursuant to the Local Rules, Defendants' opposition to the motion is due by November 18, 2010, and Plaintiff's reply is due by November 29, 2010 (the Monday after Thanksgiving);

WHEREAS Plaintiff has requested that Defendants stipulate to continue the hearing date so that Plaintiff will have additional time in which to prepare its reply and will not be required to prepare its reply over the Thanksgiving holiday weekend;

WHEREAS Defendants do not object to continuing the hearing date to permit Plaintiff to have such additional time;

WHEREAS the Court has not entered a scheduling order;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG THE PARTIES HERETO AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT (1) the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand shall be continued from December 9, 2010 to February 3, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. (a date and time previously cleared with Chambers); (2) Defendants shall file any papers in opposition to the Motion to Remand by December 20, 2010; and (3) Plaintiff shall file any reply papers in support of the Motion to Remand by January 20, 2011.

* * * * *

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer