QINETIQ LIMITED v. OCLARO, INC., 4:10-cv-00080-SBA. (2010)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20101119956
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 18, 2010
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2010
Summary: ORDER ARMSTRONG, District Judge. The Court, having considered Plaintiff QinetiQ, Limited's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Defendant Oclaro, Inc's supporting declaration, and finding good cause therefore, rules as follows: IT IS HERBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Administrative Motion is GRANTED. Exhibit B to the Declaration of James S. Blank in support of Plaintiff QinetiQ Limited's Memorandum in Opposition to Oclaro, Inc.'s Civ. L.R. 7-11 Administrative Motion for Leave to Design
Summary: ORDER ARMSTRONG, District Judge. The Court, having considered Plaintiff QinetiQ, Limited's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Defendant Oclaro, Inc's supporting declaration, and finding good cause therefore, rules as follows: IT IS HERBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Administrative Motion is GRANTED. Exhibit B to the Declaration of James S. Blank in support of Plaintiff QinetiQ Limited's Memorandum in Opposition to Oclaro, Inc.'s Civ. L.R. 7-11 Administrative Motion for Leave to Designa..
More
ORDER
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
The Court, having considered Plaintiff QinetiQ, Limited's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and Defendant Oclaro, Inc's supporting declaration, and finding good cause therefore, rules as follows:
IT IS HERBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Administrative Motion is GRANTED. Exhibit B to the Declaration of James S. Blank in support of Plaintiff QinetiQ Limited's Memorandum in Opposition to Oclaro, Inc.'s Civ. L.R. 7-11 Administrative Motion for Leave to Designate Additional Terms for Claim Construction, shall be filed under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
