LaPLANTE v. RAE SYSTEMS INC., CV-10-04944 JF. (2010)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20101221c73
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 20, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2010
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge. On December 8, 2010, Plaintiff Gary Mabry filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff Gary Mabry's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. IT IS ORDERED that Mabry v. Chen, et al., Case No. CV-10-5328-R
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge. On December 8, 2010, Plaintiff Gary Mabry filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff Gary Mabry's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. IT IS ORDERED that Mabry v. Chen, et al., Case No. CV-10-5328-RS..
More
ORDER RELATING CASES
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
On December 8, 2010, Plaintiff Gary Mabry filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing,
HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff Gary Mabry's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related.
IT IS ORDERED that Mabry v. Chen, et al., Case No. CV-10-5328-RS should be related to LaPlante v. RAE Systems Inc., et al., Case No. CV-10-04944-JF, and shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge pursuant to local Rule 3-12(f).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
