NORTHSTAR FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC. v. SCHWAB INVESTMENTS, C-08-4119 LHK. (2011)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20110121c29
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2011
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NORTHSTAR'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE AUTHORITY AND TO SUPPLEMENT ITS RESPONSE AT ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11(a) (AS MODIFIED) LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Upon the miscellaneous administrative motion by plaintiffs' counsel requesting the Court to consider Bergeron v. Ridgewood Securities Corp. , 610 F.Supp.2d 113 (D. Mass. 2009) and a brief statement of supplemental argument described in the administrative motion,
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NORTHSTAR'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE AUTHORITY AND TO SUPPLEMENT ITS RESPONSE AT ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11(a) (AS MODIFIED) LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. Upon the miscellaneous administrative motion by plaintiffs' counsel requesting the Court to consider Bergeron v. Ridgewood Securities Corp. , 610 F.Supp.2d 113 (D. Mass. 2009) and a brief statement of supplemental argument described in the administrative motion, ..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NORTHSTAR'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE AUTHORITY AND TO SUPPLEMENT ITS RESPONSE AT ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 7-11(a) (AS MODIFIED)
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Upon the miscellaneous administrative motion by plaintiffs' counsel requesting the Court to consider Bergeron v. Ridgewood Securities Corp., 610 F.Supp.2d 113 (D. Mass. 2009) and a brief statement of supplemental argument described in the administrative motion, and it appearing to the Court that it would be helpful to consider this additional authority.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court will consider this additional authority and the accompanying statement described in plaintiff's administrative motion together with any responsive argument made by defendants, pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11, not to exceed two pages. Defendants shall submit any responsive argument by Tuesday, January 25, 2011.
Source: Leagle
