Filed: Aug. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, this Court issued an order in the above-captioned action setting forth the following timing regarding the filing of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss to Lead Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") and the briefing in opposition and reply thereto (the "Briefing Schedule"): (i) Defendants shall
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, this Court issued an order in the above-captioned action setting forth the following timing regarding the filing of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss to Lead Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") and the briefing in opposition and reply thereto (the "Briefing Schedule"): (i) Defendants shall ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2011, this Court issued an order in the above-captioned action setting forth the following timing regarding the filing of Defendants' anticipated Motion to Dismiss to Lead Plaintiff's Amended Consolidated Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") and the briefing in opposition and reply thereto (the "Briefing Schedule"):
(i) Defendants shall file their Motion to Dismiss by July 1, 2011;
(ii) Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by August 16, 2011; and
(iii) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by September 16, 2011;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the June 7, 2011 order, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on July 1, 2011;
WHEREAS, this action involves complex allegations against multiple defendants for a period spanning over two years and is subject to the heightened pleading standards set forth in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; and
WHEREAS, in light of certain scheduling conflicts that have arisen in other cases and from attorney and other personnel turnover, and in light of the fact that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is not scheduled until October 28, 2011, Lead Plaintiff has requested and Defendants have agreed, subject to the approval of the Court, to modify the Briefing Schedule as follows:
(i) Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011;
(ii) Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by October 14, 2011; and
(iii) The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall still be held on October 28, 2011 or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard;
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, that Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011 and Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by October 14, 2011.
I, Sarah R. Holloway, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Modifying Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jennifer C. Bretan has concurred in this filing.
/s/
______________________________
SARAH R. HOLLOWAY
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Lead Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by September 7, 2011;
2. Defendants shall file any reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by October 14, 2011; and
3. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss shall be held on October 28, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
