Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BONATO v. YAHOO! INC., 3:11-cv-02732-CRB. (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110805b67 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 05, 2011
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2011
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION EXTENDING RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL [Civil L.R. 6-1(a)] CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. RECITALS A. Plaintiff commenced this purported securities class action on June 6, 2011; B. This action is governed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. 78u-4 et seq. (the "Reform Act"); C. Pursuant to the provisions of the Reform Act, motions for appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel a
More

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION EXTENDING RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL

[Civil L.R. 6-1(a)]

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

RECITALS

A. Plaintiff commenced this purported securities class action on June 6, 2011;

B. This action is governed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 et seq. (the "Reform Act");

C. Pursuant to the provisions of the Reform Act, motions for appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel are due to be filed on or about August 5, 2011;

D. Defendants' response to the complaint is presently due on or about August 15, 2011;

E. The parties agree that deferring Defendants' response until after the Court appoints a lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the Reform Act is prudent and will conserve party and judicial resources;

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) as follows:

1. Defendants shall have no obligation to respond to the complaint until after the Court appoints a lead plaintiff and lead counsel; and

2. Defendants will meet and confer with the court-appointed lead counsel within fourteen days after the Court makes its appointment to discuss a schedule for the filing of any amended complaint and Defendants' response, including their currently anticipated motion to dismiss.

ECF ATTESTATION

I, Mark R.S. Foster, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this:

STIPULATION EXTENDING RESPONSE DEADLINE PENDING APPOINTMENT OF LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Christopher P. Seefer has concurred in this filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer