STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' initial stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action to July 11, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' second stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including August 24, 2011; and

WHEREAS the parties are presently discussing the possible resolution of this dispute and an additional thirty (30) days would facilitate those discussions; and

WHEREAS, accordingly, Defendants have met and conferred with Plaintiff and requested an additional 30-day extension of the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint (through and including September 23, 2011); and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has consented to Defendants' request;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their respective counsel, and subject to Court approval, that the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint shall be extended from August 24, 2011 through and including September 23, 2011.

In accordance with General Order 45 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the undersigned counsel.

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, William J. Goines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Philip J. Wang has concurred in this filing.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.