Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LABORERS' LOCAL #231 PENSION FUND v. BELL, 5:11-cv-04093 EJD. (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110919b24 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR NOMINAL DEFENDANT INTERSIL TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING EDWARD J. DAVILA, Judge. WHEREAS, on August, 19, 2011, Plaintiff Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Of Loyalty, Aiding And Abetting And Unjust Enrichment in this Court against Intersil Corporation ("Intersil"); David B. Bell; Robert W. Conn, James V. Diller, Gary E. Gist, Mercedes Johnson, Greg
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR NOMINAL DEFENDANT INTERSIL TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING

EDWARD J. DAVILA, Judge.

WHEREAS, on August, 19, 2011, Plaintiff Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Of Loyalty, Aiding And Abetting And Unjust Enrichment in this Court against Intersil Corporation ("Intersil"); David B. Bell; Robert W. Conn, James V. Diller, Gary E. Gist, Mercedes Johnson, Gregory Lang, Jan Peeters, Robert N. Pokewaldt, James A. Urry, Jonathan A. Kennedy, Susan J. Hardman, Peter R. Oaklander, and David M. Loftus (collectively the "Defendants"), and Compensia, Inc. ("Compensia");

WHEREAS, Intersil has been served with the Summons and Complaint;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has requested that the Defendants waive service of process pursuant to FRCP 4(d)(1) and the Defendants have so agreed;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed on a schedule for Defendants and Intersil's responses to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order, and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) does not require a Court order for such an extension;

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff, Defendants and Intersil, through their counsel of record, stipulate to the following:

1. Defendants and Intersil, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), will answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint on October 17, 2011;

2. Should Defendants and/or Intersil move to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiff shall have until November 21, 2011, to file and serve their opposition to such motion(s); and

3. Defendants and Intersil shall have until December 16, 2011 to file and serve reply memoranda, if any, to Plaintiff's opposition(s).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Pursuant to General Order 45(X), the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Travis E. Downs III.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer