Filed: Sep. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge. Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' initial stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action to July 11, 2011; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' second stipulation exte
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge. Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' initial stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action to July 11, 2011; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' second stipulation exten..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' initial stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action to July 11, 2011; and
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' second stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including August 24, 2011; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' third stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including September 23, 2011;
WHEREAS the parties have been discussing and are continuing to discuss the possible resolution of this dispute and believe that an additional thirty (30) days would permit them to resolve this dispute; and
WHEREAS, accordingly, Defendants have met and conferred with Plaintiff and requested an additional 30-day extension of the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint (through and including October 24, 2011); and
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has consented to Defendants' request;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their respective counsel, and subject to Court approval, that the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint shall be extended from September 23, 2011 through and including October 24, 2011.
In accordance with General Order 45 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the undersigned counsel.
ATTESTATION CLAUSE
I, William J. Goines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Philip J. Wang has concurred in this filing.
Dated: September 22, 2011
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
By: William J. Goines
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
