Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LABORERS' LOCAL #231 PENSION FUND v. BELL, 5:11-cv-04093 EJD (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110930h82 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT COMPENSIA, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. WHEREAS, on August 19, 2011, Plaintiff Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Of Loyalty, Aiding And Abetting And Unjust Enrichment in this Court against Intersil Corporation ("Intersil"); David B. Bell, Robert W. Conn, James V. Diller, Gary E. Gist, Mercedes Johnso
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT COMPENSIA, INC. TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND SCHEDULING

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on August 19, 2011, Plaintiff Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund ("Plaintiff") filed its Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Of Loyalty, Aiding And Abetting And Unjust Enrichment in this Court against Intersil Corporation ("Intersil"); David B. Bell, Robert W. Conn, James V. Diller, Gary E. Gist, Mercedes Johnson, Gregory Lang, Jan A. Peeters, Robert N. Pokewaldt, James A. Urry, Jonathan A. Kennedy, Susan J. Hardman, Peter R. Oaklander, and David M. Loftus (collectively, the "Defendants"), and Compensia, Inc. ("Compensia");

WHEREAS, Compensia has been served with the Summons and Complaint;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Intersil and all other Defendants have previously agreed on a schedule for Defendants and Intersil's responses to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, Compensia has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that Compensia should have the same schedule as Defendants and Intersil to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order, and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) does not require a Court order for such an extension;

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Compensia, through their counsel of record, stipulate to the following:

1. Compensia, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), will answer, move or otherwise responds to the Complaint on October 17, 2011;

2. Should Compensia more to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiff shall have until November 21, 2011 to file and serve its opposition to such motion; and

3. Compensia and Intersil shall have until December 16, 2011 to file and serve reply memoranda, if any, to Plaintiff's opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Pursuant to General Order 45(X), the filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Travis E. Downs III.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer