Filed: Nov. 28, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER THIS ACTION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE DISMISS OR STAY THIS ACTION AND STRIKE THE CLASS ALLEGATIONS SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants SMART Technologies Inc., David A. Martin, Nancy L. Knowlton, G.A. Fitch, Salim Nathoo, Arvind Sodhani, Intel Corporation, Apax Partners, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (f/k/a Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.), Deutsche B
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER THIS ACTION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE DISMISS OR STAY THIS ACTION AND STRIKE THE CLASS ALLEGATIONS SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants SMART Technologies Inc., David A. Martin, Nancy L. Knowlton, G.A. Fitch, Salim Nathoo, Arvind Sodhani, Intel Corporation, Apax Partners, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (f/k/a Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.), Deutsche Ba..
More
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO TRANSFER THIS ACTION OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE DISMISS OR STAY THIS ACTION AND STRIKE THE CLASS ALLEGATIONS
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants SMART Technologies Inc., David A. Martin, Nancy L. Knowlton, G.A. Fitch, Salim Nathoo, Arvind Sodhani, Intel Corporation, Apax Partners, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (f/k/a Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.), Deutsche Bank AG, and RBC Dominion Securities Inc. ("Defendants"), and Plaintiffs Thomas E. Harper and Dianne Keene ("Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following stipulation.
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion to Transfer this action or in the alternative Dismiss or Stay this action and Strike the Class Allegations ("Defendants' Motion");
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs intend to oppose Defendants' Motion;
WHEREAS, on November 9, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand this action ("Plaintiffs' Motion");
WHEREAS, Defendants intend to oppose Plaintiffs' Motion;
WHEREAS, the Local Rules for the Northern District of California require that, unless otherwise ordered, Defendants' Motion would be fully briefed by November 29, 2011 and that Plaintiffs' Motion would be fully briefed by November 30, 2011;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have conferred about establishing a more flexible schedule for completing briefing on their respective Motions;
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. Plaintiffs and Defendants shall file their respective opposition papers in response to the Motions by December 2, 2011.
2. Plaintiffs and Defendants shall file their respective reply papers in support of the Motions by December 16, 2011.
The requested extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by any Court order.
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have on file written permission to sign this joint motion from all parties whose signatures are indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
Sara B. Brody
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
