Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE SUNPOWER SECURITIES LITIGATION, CV 09-5473-RS (Consolidated). (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20120105c60 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2012
Summary: CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS, on December 19, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants SunPower Corporation, Thomas H. Werner, Dennis V. Arriola, Emmanuel T. Hernandez, T.J. Rodgers, W. Steve Albrecht, Betsy S. Atkins, Patrick Wood, III, and Uwe-Ernst Bufe's (collectively, "Defendants") motion to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the "Complaint") of Lead Plai
More

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants SunPower Corporation, Thomas H. Werner, Dennis V. Arriola, Emmanuel T. Hernandez, T.J. Rodgers, W. Steve Albrecht, Betsy S. Atkins, Patrick Wood, III, and Uwe-Ernst Bufe's (collectively, "Defendants") motion to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the "Complaint") of Lead Plaintiffs Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Första-AP Fonden, and Danske Investment Management A/S (ECF No. 178);

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendants to answer the Complaint is January 9, 2012;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendants shall have up to and including January 27, 2012, to answer the Complaint;

WHEREAS, by the Clerk's Notice entered on October 19, 2011 (ECF No. 177), a case management conference in the above-captioned action is scheduled for January 12, 2012;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to request a continuance of the January 12, 2012 case management conference until February 16, 2012, or such later date that is convenient for the Court;

WHEREAS, if the Court grants the parties' requested continuance, counsel for the parties have agreed to hold their Rule 26(f) conference on February 3, 2012;

WHEREAS, if the Court grants the parties' requested continuance, the parties have agreed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1) that the parties (i) may serve requests for the production of documents pursuant to Rules 34 and 45 beginning January 16, 2012, (ii) will not object to the requests as premature on the grounds that the requests were served prior to the parties' Rule 26(f) conference, and (iii) do not waive their rights to object to the requests on any other grounds and reserve the right to request an extension of time to respond to the requests; and

WHEREAS, it would conserve judicial and party resources and promote efficiency and economy to hold the case management conference in this action after Defendants' answer is filed, Lead Plaintiffs have reviewed the answer, and the parties have adequately addressed scheduling, discovery, and the additional case management topics of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f), Local Rule 16-9, and the Court's Standing Order Re: Initial Case Management.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the undersigned parties as follows:

(1) Defendants shall have up to and including January 27, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;

(2) The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 12, 2012, shall be continued to February 16, 2012, or such later date as is convenient for the Court;

(3) The parties shall hold their Rule 26(f) conference on or before February 3, 2012;

(4) The parties (i) may serve requests for the production of documents pursuant to Rules 34 and 45 beginning January 16, 2012, (ii) will not object to the requests as premature on the grounds that the requests were served prior to the parties' Rule 26(f) conference, and (iii) do not waive their rights to object to the requests on any other grounds and reserve the right to request an extension of time to respond to the requests; and

(5) In accordance with paragraph 7 of the Court's Standing Order Re: Initial Case Management, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement and Proposed Order seven (7) days prior to the Case Management Conference.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer