IN RE HELLER EHRMAN LLP v. ARNOLD AND PORTER, LLP, C11-04848 CRB. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120110625
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Upon entry of the Court's Order Denying Motion to Withdraw the Reference and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR: There appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes. Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office. Nothing contained in this minute entry shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and should further proceedings in this liti
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Upon entry of the Court's Order Denying Motion to Withdraw the Reference and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR: There appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes. Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office. Nothing contained in this minute entry shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and should further proceedings in this litig..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
Upon entry of the Court's Order Denying Motion to Withdraw the Reference and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR:
There appears to be no further reason at this time to maintain the file as an open one for statistical purposes. Accordingly, the Clerk is instructed to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office.
Nothing contained in this minute entry shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action, and should further proceedings in this litigation become necessary or desirable, any party may initiate it in the same manner as if this order had not been entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
