HARMIN INVESTMENTS, LP #109 v. MANSOORI, 5:11-CV-06141 EJD. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120213462
Filed: Feb. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Re: Docket Item Nos. 5, 12) EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. No objections having been received within the time allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 18, 2012. This Order terminates Docket Item Nos. 5 and 12. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that hearing on Plaintiff's motion to reman
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Re: Docket Item Nos. 5, 12) EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. No objections having been received within the time allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 18, 2012. This Order terminates Docket Item Nos. 5 and 12. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that hearing on Plaintiff's motion to remand..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
(Re: Docket Item Nos. 5, 12)
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
No objections having been received within the time allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 18, 2012. This Order terminates Docket Item Nos. 5 and 12.
For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that hearing on Plaintiff's motion to remand is VACATED and the case shall be REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. The Clerk shall close this file upon entry of Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
