HERSON v. CITY OF RICHMOND, C 09-2516 PJH. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20120410691
Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Beeler's March 9, 2012, Report and Recommendation Re: plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees. No objections have been filed. The court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Beeler's March 9, 2012, Report and Recommendation Re: plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees. No objections have been filed. The court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
